Awareness is a Dead Metric*

Three Ways to Improve How We Measure

brown and white border collie mix puppy

Hands up if you joined the marketing industry because you love numbers? Come on… let’s be honest!

The truth is, most of us are in this field because we love creativity and understanding what makes different people tick. We know how to get attention.

But attention isn’t the end-goal (conversion is), and we can’t shy away from the fact that measuring the numbers is just as important as the ideas – especially as we’re about to hit the hard stop of no more third-party cookies in October.

Let’s look at three key questions we need answers to in order to get better at measurement in 2023 and beyond:

  1. Should We Stop Measuring Awareness?

Increased ‘awareness’ in isolation means little for already established brands if it didn’t move people down the attention funnel towards conversion. And yet, we continue to see this as the primary - and standalone - marketing objective of most briefs.

We should spend way more time on increasing consideration and purchase intent by being relevant. This is possible not just by using the most relevant proxies (e.g. saves, shares, comments), but also mining the conversations and data here for deeper audience understanding. We can also do this by directly asking audiences questions through polls (now available in the comments on Instagram), or even indirectly via off-platform studies (especially if that’s something entrenched within the brand’s legacy measurement process).

And while we’re at it, let’s stop asking people “How did you hear about us?” Unless your brand is new, most people have already heard of you and tend to have no recollection how this awareness originated. Instead, ask questions like, “Why did you buy?” and “What do you like about our product/service?” to better understand the relevance of the brand.

  1. Are We Measuring Directly or Indirectly?

For almost 20 years, the industry has used attribution technology – with its black box models and algorithms – to tell us how effective their marketing is. This indirect process can make estimations that will sometimes be close to the truth, but there is a serious lack of transparency: Nobody except the owners of the technology knows exactly how it measures. 

The alternative is to measure directly – without the estimations – but that comes with its own set of challenges… Why? Because platforms tend to want to attribute as much credit as possible to their own channels to retain ad revenue, they often emphasise on last-touch attribution rather than understanding how the different channels collaborated to drive people to conversion (despite evidence that shows the efficacy of multi-channel marketing strategies). 

  1. How Are We Connecting the Impact of the Channels?

Any marketing – whether a single short-form video or a full-length TV ad – delivers two potential results. 

Either:

  1. Incremental reach and conversions, where people only see the ad in a single channel or 

  2. Shared reach and conversions, where they see ads in multiple channels

If the brand is only using one marketing channel, measurement becomes easier. You can assess incremental reach and conversions, and probably don’t need a third-party to help you. But for the majority of brands, it’s essential to run tests to assess the multi-channel lift if you measure – for example – how much better search marketing works when run alongside Instagram (e.g. it converts twice as many customers).

Better measurement – through better attribution – is a continuous and iterative process. It’s not something that can be resolved with a one-off meeting or a monthly call, nor can significant changes be made overnight. 

This ongoing journey of improvement begins with the question, “How are we utilising this data?” 

And while daily application is ideal, a weekly or monthly cadence might be  more realistic. Whatever the chosen frequency, a unanimous decision needs to be made, and consistency is key. The data should serve not only to optimise performance marketing, but also to generate and derive deeper human insights for brand campaigns. Achieving this dual outcome is easier when a single team oversees all the data sets, but that’s a separate discussion for another day…

Ultimately, there is only one marketing question discussed regularly at C-suite level: how much is it costing to drive people to buy the product or service?

There is no magic silver bullet, but asking these three questions and shifting how we view measurement will get us all closer to that nirvana.

-

*For most established brands and their products/services